Friday, May 1, 2009
Caitlin Nelson - reading
I actually would like to respond to your paper that you read us in class. I really enjoyed listening to it, and it was really well written. Ever since you read it to us every time I get onto the interstate I attempt to read the sign of prohibitions. And I guess when I think about it, it does seem odd that people would be strictly prohibited from walking where they please, especially when it is such a big area. I think that if a person wants to take the risk to walk down the interstate it should be allowed, but then I guess at the same time that is dangerous not only for them but also for the drivers on the road. It's hard to draw a line between what is fair and what is not fair, and still balance it with what it overall the best and safest decision for everyone. We really don't walk anywhere anymore, I honestly wish that it was more practical for me to walk or ride a bike to places. It would be enjoyable and it would save me gas money. However, most places aren't built with the thought of people walking in mind. It would be impossible for me to get from my house to work on time, because it would take an hour or so to get there. Everything is so spread out whereI live that it just isn't practical. The other issue I have with walking is that it isn't always the safest choice, at least for females. I know it sounds paranoid, but it is rooted in truth. A female walking alone down a road does make her somewhat vulnerable. Who knows if one of the people honking might suddenly take it to the next level and try to pick you up. There are creepy people out there, and the world is not as safe as it used to be. So although walking places would be the ideal choice a lot of the time, it is not necessarily the safest choice.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment